It looked like renewable energy advocates in Nevada were going to win the legislative Triple Crown last week, but two of the three clean energy bills in contention never made it across the finish line.
Republican Governor Brian Sandoval vetoed the two bills on Friday, citing uncertainty amid Nevada’s pending shift to an open and competitive energy market.
AB 206 would have increased the state’s renewable portfolio standard (RPS) to 40 percent by 2030, up from 25 percent in 2025, and created attractive new incentives for energy storage. The second bill, SB 392, would have established a 200-megawatt community solar program by 2023.
On Thursday last week, Sandoval signed a popular bill (AB 405) that restored net metering credits for rooftop solar customers in the Silver State, giving the distributed energy market an enormous boost. Following that win, supporters hoped the RPS and community solar bills would get approval too.
AB 405 appears to have complicated things for the community solar bill, however. In his veto message, Sandoval said he was concerned that SB 392 could conflict with the rooftop solar policy.
“SB392 attempts to link itself to AB405 by requiring the solar energy credits to be the same for both rooftop solar and community solar gardens,” Sandoval’s veto said. “Although I am confident that the system set up by AB405 will be beneficial to Nevada and its solar energy economy, it is unclear whether these bills are compatible or conflicting.”
Sandoval said he was also concerned about passing new energy legislation in light of the state’s pending Energy Choice Initiative, which could dramatically restructure Nevada’s electricity market if voters give the initiative second approval in 2018. Solar advocates argued that rejecting the community solar program flies in the face of public opinion.
“Governor Sandoval’s disappointing decision to veto community solar access is at odds with the more than 70 percent of Nevadan voters who supported energy choices in November’s election, and with the overwhelming support for community solar from national security experts, faith communities, small businesses, and clean energy advocates,” said Jessica Scott, interior west director at Vote Solar.
Sandoval also cited the Energy Choice Initiative as his reason for vetoing the ambitious new RPS target, despite his overall support for the expansion of clean energy in the state.
On the path to an open and competitive market “decisions must be responsibly informed with research, study and debate, particularly with the likelihood of the approval of energy choice in Nevada next year,” the governor wrote in his veto message, The Nevada Independent reports. “For these reasons, although the promise of AB 206 is commendable, its adoption is premature in the face of evolving energy policy in Nevada.”
Nevada’s powerful casino lobby group was a strong opponent of AB 206, because it would have required large gaming companies, who recently paid tens of millions in exit fees to purchase power on the open market, to also meet the higher renewable energy targets. In April, Virginia Valentine, president of the Nevada Resort Association, wrote a letter to lawmakers that said, “We are concerned that this bill may be too much and too soon.”
Renewable energy advocates sought to reach a compromise with opponents by lowering the initially proposed RPS target from 50 percent to 40 percent by 2030, and by creating multiplier credits for energy storage. The law would have allowed storage to meet up to 10 percent of the overall RPS target. Sandoval’s veto kills Nevada’s novel energy storage targets.
“Distributed generation landed an important win from the net metering restoration bill. But what is unfortunate is that Nevada had a chance to be on the forefront of the next wave of RPS legislation,” said Cory Honeyman, associate director for U.S. solar at GTM Research. “Nevada's bill had an important and forward-thinking plan to explicitly credit storage deployment in future RPS obligations. And as more and more corporates continue to procure large-scale solar in the state, on top of a reboot in rooftop solar, what's now missing is a state-level policy framework to pair all of that solar deployment with storage to support higher levels of solar penetration on the grid.”
To address the energy market concerns raised in his veto messages, Sandoval tasked his Committee on Energy Choice to study the ramifications of a higher renewable portfolio standard, as well as a community solar program, and issue a set of recommendations ahead of the 2019 session — the next time lawmakers in Nevada will meet.
Renewable energy advocates are already positioning to override Sandoval’s vetoes in the next session. Assemblyman Chris Brooks, who sponsored the RPS bill, said he plans to work with corporate and clean energy stakeholders to bring back the measure in 2019. AB 206 was backed by Apple, Tesla, Unilever and several other prominent businesses, including MGM Resorts — which broke with the casino lobby group in choosing to support the RPS proposal.
“Our goal this session was to shift Nevada away from a boom-and-bust cycle economy and towards a more prosperous future,” said Brooks. “AB 206 would have made Nevada not just a national leader, but a world leader, in the next generation of clean and renewable energy sources that would have diversified our economy and created good-paying, high-quality jobs.”
Nevada electric utilities currently spend around $700 million each year importing fossil fuels, according to the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC). Meanwhile, the cost of procuring electricity from large-scale solar farms has fallen by 80 percent since Nevada last changed its RPS target in 2009. In a recent report, NRDC found that AB 206 would have added thousands of megawatts of clean power to Nevada’s grid, while attracting billions of dollars in capital investment and economic development, and creating thousands of jobs.
“Governor Sandoval was persuaded by the fringe elements of his party, instead of listening to science and the people of Nevada,” said Dylan Sullivan, senior scientist at NRDC. “In a place as sunny as Nevada, it makes no sense to rely primarily on out-of-state fossil fuels for electricity.”